TJ and I never planned on living together. Neither of us
wanted this much house actually. As young widows, we both promised our kids
we’d have separate places. Ahh, the silly promises we make.
When we both moved
to the Bay Area from Washington State, we couldn’t afford two houses.
After sitting down with our kids to explain the "revised
arrangement," we naively bought the most square footage we could afford
together. We figured everyone would have separation that way. Ha! Ya know,
that’s a total fallacy. Privacy is determined by the layout and flow through
rooms, not their size. This Victorian with its huge great room has over
4,500sf, and all the common rooms – like the living or dining room - feel like
hallways to somewhere else. Victorian house circulation just flows that way. There are so many
doorways in and out of each room that there’s no sense you can really sit with
others to have a quiet conversation. People pass through the room’s activities
on their way to another space.
This place has made me realize that the best rooms are
the intimate side rooms off of larger spaces: the small side office off the
main living areas, sitting rooms and the little 8x8 extra rooms off the
bedroom. They have sweet, sweet feelings. I’ve put a wonderful craft and sewing
room into one.
Years ago, when my daughter needed more space in her room, we
moved her bed into the smaller sitting area, 7 x 12 ft. Besides making that
sleeping area feel more private and intimate (She liked the feeling so much we
also added hanging drapes around the bed a la Elizabethan times.) That opened
the main room up for whatever else she wanted to do.
More importantly perhaps, it allowed her space to keep morphing, and it
became more hers when the bed wasn’t the main story the room told.
No comments:
Post a Comment